Showing posts with label Male Privilege. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Male Privilege. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Michael Jackson, Lil Wayne, R. Kelly & Roman Polanski: Media Coverage Vs. Perception

I was reading this essay last night. Oh, I feel a headache coming on as I'm writing this but it's the big giant pink elephant in the room. Depending on what you believe, what you've been led to believe, actual court proceedings or a refusal to accept reality we could made a wide arc and include all of the men in one category. It just depends which side of the fence you reside on. All have achieved artistic success. Some are more vilified than others. Two have been acquitted. One was never tried. One needs to be investigated. Some are victims themselves. Some displayed clear grooming tactics of a sexual predator. Let's discuss. One thing that will always be a hindrance in discussing this is race and class. 

Roman Polanski: His pregnant wife had been tortured and murdered when he turned his grief and rage onto an unsuspecting 13 year old. Court testimony clearly indicates that he drugged and violated a minor. We don't need to go into details. Yet the mother who had offered her own child up for a potential movie role got off scott free. The problem was the judge tipped his hand about his personal feelings so the defense could claim bias. Yet he was guilty. Yet people felt sorry for him, so he was allowed to skip the country. Male privilege wins again. I say allowed because all the years Polanski's been on the "lam" he's been yukking it up in France. His wealth has been intact, he's had rather favorable press, he still works and was even nominated for an Oscar. He's been able to publicly complain about not being allowed back in the US. France and the US do have extradition laws. They could have demanded him back to stand trial at any time if they'd wanted. There was further attempt at revising history with a documentary where his teenage victim (who's in her 30's now) declares that "the incident" is all behind her now and she'd like everyone to move on. Should we? Why? What punishment did he actually receive when he would've long served any time if he'd actually been convicted. He probably would've been able to get it tossed out on appeal. Running away never solves anything. So his discomfort at being "inconvenienced" is mostly his own design. He never expressed serious remorse for what he did. Compare his press coverage to....

Michael Jackson: Case #1. It was problematic from the start because it had the wiff of shadiness. Johnny Cochran defended him. He settled out of court and paid millions. I'm not a parent but I always thought no amount of money would make me settle a case like that. I'd want a trial. Apparently there wasn't enough evidence. We know that cases involving sexual misconduct are difficult to prosecute. We also know as with the McMartin case children can be coached to lie. I think people with an agenda to discredit someone or lessen their sphere of influence always involve a very publicly humiliating situation that offends. MJ's mere presence as the biggest star on the planet would be considered a threat to the order of white supremacy. That influence could have political ramifications as evidenced by his humanitarian efforts and attempts at normalizing the face of AIDs. On the other hand his abuse and childhood trauma was nothing to ignore either. He displayed an obstinance at having things his way. There comes a point where you have to take control of your inner demons. He may have wanted to be a kid in his head but the reality was that he was a grown man. Yet he was vulnerable to Case #2 which had holes bigger than swiss cheese and a prosecutor who requested the state law be changed with a one-time exception to prosecute and was granted. Now who does that? That makes the Polanski claim of bias from the 70's look like a joke. He was acquitted. The problem was that people watched the Bashir interview and saw with their own eyes the lack of good judgment on MJ's part. I saw a young boy who seemed to really adore him and it bothered me. It was the proximity, the lack of boundaries and the still unresolved issues all on display and I couldn't believe MJ would so foolishly expose all of that for the world to see. The backlash was severe. I think we lost him then and that was years ago. Now there are rumors that Case #1 accuser Jordan Chandler wants to recant but that ship has long sailed and there are people who will never believe him one way or the other. They have twenty million reasons to doubt.

Lil Wayne: He has publicly admitted to being an abuse survivor. That's a brave thing. I'm not sure that's he's actually survived anything though. He seems to be mired in it. He still has contact with the relative that violated him. He allowed his own 10-year old daughter to dance on stage with him at the BET Awards and other grown men while he sang a song about wanting to sex as many women as he could. That's grooming behavior of a pedophile. I would hate to think he's unconsciously setting the stage for his own child to be harmed but there it is.  All the outrage people expressed is justified but what has anyone done about it. I'd suggested people call Protective Services but I don't think I made that a definitive statement. This blogger did. It should be done. Apparently he has a fiancee and a third woman knocked up at the same time. Boy I could talk about acting out, irresponsible behavior, greed and a host of other nonsense but I feel dirty right now. I wonder if people forget they're displaying their pathologies for the world to see and many are not impressed? Worse yet were all the people in the audience who seemed to be oblivious to this scenario and were carrying on as if nothing was wrong with the debauchery on display. 

R. Kelly: Well he was acquitted. We have the tape though. We know what he did and what he's done to many others that will never see the light of day because law enforcement didn't follow proper evidence collecting procedures. The excuses made by other black women was very telling and equally appalling. We have the tape. We have the tape. The one tape that made it to the light of day. There were many others. If one of the young girls had been white he'd be in prison right now, but apparently the value for a black female body is....not much. Race loyalty over common sense. If someone would accuse us of making too many allowances for any other music star I can point to this man and trump them. Which isn't really a win. **Now there's word that prosecutors are looking to charge him in another case. Let's hope if they do they don't blow this case like the last one.

In all of these situations we have people who've been erased, silenced, marginalized or ignored. This is the time to discuss our dirty little secrets and remove that veil of shame once and for all. Victims can become perpetrators and all sympathy must go out the door. Race and class and gender have just as much to do with it as anything else. The influence of media on making things appear larger, grosser or lesser cannot be discounted. Our own prejudices taint our viewpoints. The guilty go free, there may not be any innocent in any of these scenarios and we have life circumstances where better judgment would have led to a much smoother life. It's a mess. Life is messy. Regardless we're just spectators in all of these situations. There are those who actually have to live through it and with what they've done.

Bookmark and Share
TwitThis

Saturday, June 13, 2009

You're So Lame Award of Shame: Cornel West Meet Uncle Ruckus

I can't keep giving them out to angry and violent white men, but that does give me an idea for an "Angry White Man Award of the Week". That will just get boring though. So....Dr. West gets the honors this week. Though he should be sharing it with Smiley and Dyson - which I'll get into below. This is for his penchant for wanting to spend time in the Crack House vs. the White House as per his statement via TWIB
"That's not my calling. Yeah, brother, you find me in a crack house before you find me in the White House. I'll go into the crack house before I ever go that far inside.
Really?
Seriously.

Is this what an Ivy-League education produces....and reproduces? Like when does he actually travel without a car service and what does he know about standing on the corner in the 'hood? He'd rather immerse himself in a dangerous environment with people caught in the demonic throws of drug addiction instead of speaking to the President about possibly doing something that would eliminate the need for a crack house to exist?

Idiot!

This is why I was gently admonished by a reader for lamenting about why some Black female bloggers can't come to a consensus. Unless it's for some external cause like fighting the great white oppression many of us have absolutely nothing in common and we shouldn't expect to. 

So he, Michael Eric Dyson and Tavis Smiley, whom I'll dub the "Triumvirate of Ego & Stupidity" keep harping on the President for the sake of being argumentative - not for any serious policy discussion. Just. Walk. Away. It's more pseudo-intelligentsia childish temper tantrums. I have yet to see any of these men spearhead one major campaign where they support or defend Black women on any issues of importance. They are the flip side of Reverend Co. (you know Sharpton, Jackson, et al) who have never met a Black male criminal they won't defend or rubber chicken dinner with money left under the plate they won't attend. Perhaps I'm being extra hard on Jackson, Sr. 

No...don't think so!

Dr. Melissa Harris Lacewell took them to task for this last week in her piece, Don't Hold Obama Accountable to a Race Agenda" where she says:
On May 24, TV One aired the latest installment of Smiley's accountability campaign: a two-hour documentary titled "Stand." Recycling Spike Lee's Million Man March film, "Get On the Bus," Smiley assembled a group of prominent black male public figures for a bus ride through the South.

Ostensibly, this bus trip would provide Smiley, professors Cornel West and Michael Eric Dyson, Dick Gregory and others an opportunity to reflect on the meaningful upheavals in American society and politics in the summer of 2008. "Stand" was an enormous disappointment.

Its low production value, wandering narrative, flat history and self-important egoism did little to reveal the shortcomings of the Obama phenomenon. Instead, the piece exposed and embodied the contemporary crisis of the black public intellectual in the age of Obama.

The film and its participants (two of them my senior colleagues at Princeton University) appropriated the legacy of the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. to implicitly claim that they, not Obama, are the authentic representatives of the political interests of African-Americans. They used King's images and speeches, gathered on the balcony where King was assassinated, and explicitly asserted their desire to play King to Obama's LBJ, and Frederick Douglass to Obama's Lincoln.

Really?
Seriously.
Shudder.

We've got a serious domestic terrorism problem brewing where a few angry white men are going to Set It Off and this is all these "esteemed" men can talk about? Perhaps that's the point. If they keep saying these childish and foolish things we'll keep talking about them. Not Obama. Which is just they way they'd like it. For that - they get the SLAP!!!!
By the way I've got one major policy issue that's open for discussion right now: DOMA!

Bookmark and Share